Share this program:

Advocate Articles

Two cases that have positively impacted employment law for plaintiffs (Advocate Article)

Share this program:

Order now for immediate access to this title.

Order Now

Already Ordered?

Login
Price

$0 for Affiliates
$0 for CAALA Members
$0 for CAALA Staff
$0 for Law Students
$0 for Paralegals
$10 for Non-Members

Date Published

April 1, 2016

Publisher

Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles

Subjects

Employment Law

Questions

For immediate assistance please consult our FAQ page. If you're unable to find the answer you need, please call 737-201-2059 (M-F, 8am-6pm CT) or e-mail customer service.

Summary

Harris v. Santa Monica changes employment-discrimination law; Williams v. Chino Valley protects plaintiffs in FEHA cases from paying defense’s legal fees.

Expand summary
back to top

Presenters

Renuka Jain

Renuka Jain has tried more than thirty cases to verdict in state and federal courts in California and Texas. She has obtained... Read More

back to top

Included Components

Title includes the following components:

Two cases that have positively impacted employment law for plaintiffs - Paper
back to top

Technical Requirements

If the title includes downloadable materials, all you need is a computer with high-speed internet access and the various software packages used to download and open supporting materials.
If the title includes mail order CD-ROMs/DVDs, the materials will be shipped within 7-10 business days to the billing address provided.

back to top

More

Refund Policy
SeminarWeb titles are non-refundable.

Privacy Statement
We respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. Read Statement.